Dirty hippies are beautiful and way less dangerous than clean bankers.
The soul of this country has always been nurtured by people more interested in freedom than in regular baths: revolutionaries, pioneers, cowboys, Henry Thoreau and Walt Whitman all lived in sweat and dirt.
Yet in mainstream media I see a sentiment expressed time and time again: the Occupy movement would be great if it wasn't just a bunch of dirty hippies. The implied notion is that to be dirty (presumably to be relatively unwashed- clothes muddied, hair greasy) and to be a hippy (someone committed to ideals of peace, equality, justice-- someone more interested in love than in profit) are cardinal, unforgivable sins.
This attitude, popular as it is, is itself a sign of the incredible mental and moral distortion that our country is suffering.
The notion that dirty hippies are wrong and bad for the fact of being dirty and being hippies is a weird, dislocated and perverse remnant of the Protestant-Puritan work ethic ideal. It's a notion that pretends to defend the dignity of clean, hard-working, upright people who live by the rules and produce the goods. These clean, decent people (we are meant to imagine) are being harassed and put-upon by folks who are so lazy and good-for-nothing that they refuse to even take a bath. The image of the dirty hippy is raised up as a resented foi -- how dare someone relax their mandated hygiene schedule? How dare someone adopt principles that aren't supportive of the existing paradigm when I have to shave and shower and get up for work in the morning?"
In a bizarre manipulative twist, people learn to hate and revile those individuals who are doing their best to live outside the oppressive system (those damn dirty hippies) rather than the oppressive, corrupt system itself.
Here's something to consider, America: dirty hippies aren't stealing your money; dirty hippies aren't bleeding you dry with debt; dirty hippies didn't get billion dollar bail-outs from the federal government. Who does that? Oh, that's right-- all those squeaky-clean, ultra-respectable bankers, that's who. Out-of-control banks and corporations are the real threat to American decency and prosperity, not people who like to listen to Bob Marley and beat on drums.
Also, I'd like to advance a notion which may seem radical: the dirty hippies in my acquaintance are the hardest working people I know. They just don't work for corporations. Instead they work doing things directly for the people immediately around them: caring for children, cooking donated food for free distribution to big groups, waitressing at small restaurants, building sacred art installations, teaching yoga, organizing community groups, skillfully repairing cars and musical instruments and clothing that others have discarded. All of those things take intense amounts of work.
That's why I find it powerfully ironic when folks shout "Get a job!" at the Occupy Pittsburgh protesters standing with signs on the corner of 6th Avenue and Grant. As if a job was in itself an unassailable value. As if the vast majority of jobs weren't repetitive, alienating, soul-deleting. No one needs a job. But we all need meaningful work and support to live.
Work is important. Work is tremendously valuable. Work is labor directed in such a way that the whole community benefits. That's the kind of work that the Puritan forefathers valued: work that kept the village alive and prospering. Labor done in the service of a gigantic corporation is not work in this sense. It doesn't put value into the community so much as it extracts it. All those laboring in these kids of jobs are left feeling depleted, drained, purposeless. Their work has no obvious benefit to their community aside from the pay check it brings, and that is ever-shrinking. The value of their work floats off into the hands of their corporate overlords rather than extending to their children, their friends, their neighbors.
So then what happens? People become filled with ennui. They turn to pornography, drugs (both psychiatric and recreational -- the distinction is perhaps not that substantial), alcohol, over-eating (witness the obesity epidemic), inane television. Anything to numb the pain of not being free, of not being allowed to live as their souls dictate. D.H. Lawrence said that people think freedom means being able to do whatever you want-- but it doesn't really mean that. Freedom means the ability to obey your own soul rather than an external authority, and it's an ability that can be cultivated and exercised even in the most adverse conditions, even in conditions that mean it might be hard for you to wash your clothes and get a bath if you chose to obey your soul.
But that's just the kind of freedom that dirty hippies are exercising, and they're doing it on behalf of all of us. They deserve our gratitude much more than our scorn.
Rate this article
Comments
Rock on, Carolyn. I am happy these "hippies" are changing our political conversation for a change. If people were not so insecure--so afraid--of all the freedom and self-accountability that comes with being a "hippie," they would not feel the need to verbally (or physically) attack these guys.
I can relate to this feeling of disdain for "dirty hippies." Working in nonprofits, living in Oakland, and attending Burning Man for the last three years, it is interesting to notice my own mental pattern of trying to distinguish myself from the "dirty hippie," yet at the same time, not feeling comfortable with the corporate set. Fortunately I seem to have found a subset of people who are honest, hard-working and committed to progressive values. I think maybe it's because I've chosen to live in one of the most forward thinking regions of the world. Many people come here because of the proximity to nature, and the cultural diversity. Here you can find clean cut radicals, and venture capitalists who like to go on local hikes. As described in permaculture principles, you can find aliveness and adaptations taking places on the edges of things, and to me it seems there are lots of edges for interesting versions of "dirty hippies" and "squeaky clean" financial folks in the Bay Area.
I really appreciate your essay, Carolyn. Well done. I want to extend the conversation on baths, though. Bathing and hygiene in the 19th and early 20th centuries when people didn't have running water or indoor toilets vs. now with more and more folks not having access to bathrooms isn't a valid comparison.
I do not feel disdain for hippies, having spent most of my adult life in their company. I held non-corporate jobs fairly consistently, mostly as a teacher and freelance writer and artist. We were not "dirty." We didn't have a lot of money to spend on new clothes but they were clean and often beautiful. Most of our gang bathed often enough. Who were often dirty and sometimes smelly? Drug addicts and people who were experimenting with not bathing in defiance of their upbringing or parents.
The homeless have a good excuse: they have no bathing facilities. Crowded cities used to have inexpensive public bath houses. Even the very poor felt the need to bathe to maintain their dignity. During wartime with everything blown up, no water supply, people get lice and diseases if they don't bathe. We may have to bring back public bath houses. Occupy campers are offered showers by the support network. This problem may get worse. Many people will not be able to buy a home or even pay rent. Let's get creative -- use this as an opening for the good.
I have been a CLEAN semi-hippie since the seventies. Love the idea of public bath houses for cities. Though it is heartbreaking to think they would be built because a city just expects to have a number of homeless. We used one in Amsterdam years ago, but it existed because the old flats were not built with decent bathrooms. Toilets, yes, bathrooms, not.
Related Articles
- Occupy as a New Societal Model & Ways To Improve It
- Crafting Community on a Ride with Strangers
- On The Solidarity Economy: A Q&A with Mira Luna
- Authors, Publishers and Supporters React to the Seizure of the People's Library
- Living Without Money is an Act of Community
- Recap From SHARE NY
- Open Letter to the Occupy Movement: It’s Time for the Ultimate Occupation
- Collaborative Chats Recap - Building Community in the Sharing Economy
- The Cob Cat House that Community Built
- The Park and The Protests
Community Blog Posts
-
By Jay Cousins
-
By Nipun Mehta
-
By Rik Crevits
Recent comments
-
4 hours 5 min ago
-
14 hours 10 min ago
-
1 day 12 hours ago
-
1 day 12 hours ago
-
1 day 23 hours ago



You lost me at "Puritan forefathers."