The sharing economy is in a regulatory crisis. Airbnb’s hotel tax issues, the cease and desist orders slapped on peer mobility apps Sidecar and Lyft, and other brushes with the law have catalyzed a flurry of organizing and dialogue about sharing economy regulation.
It started with the launch of San Francisco’s Sharing Economy Working Group in April, and was followed with the formation of the Bay Area Sharing Economy Coalition in August, lobbying by the Collaborative Economy Coalition at the Democratic National Convention in September. SPUR’s Gabriel Metcalfe wrote a provocative opinion piece about it earlier this month, and Shareable’s April Rinne and NYU professor Arun Sundararjan offered much commented counterpoints.
This is a sure sign the sharing economy is maturing. It’s big enough for the government to take notice and participants are strong enough to begin working together. Before this space crystallizes further, it’s a good time to reflect on what's possible. The opportunity to shape the direction of this movement may soon pass. Below I reflect on what I see as the biggest opportunity before us - nothing less than a radical democratization of the economy - and how to make it happen.
Lead with vision
Talking about new laws before there’s a vision to pave the way is putting the cart before the horse. Many get this, but it's understandably not the top priority in the face of pressing regulatory issues. Nothing truly transformative has ever been accomplished without an inspiring vision. History provides ample evidence of the power of vision.
Apple’s 1984 Macintosh TV ad is a famous example. The ad didn’t even show the Macintosh computer or mention its features. It delivered a revolutionary message that promised to liberate the creative energies of the oppressed masses. It led with vision.
Dr. Martin Luther King didn’t talk about laws when he delivered his “I Have a Dream” speech. He shared a vision in which America finally lived the meaning of its creed -- that all people are created equal. Dr. King, the Baptist preacher, undoubtedly knew that he must lead with vision, for the bible says in Proverbs 29:18, “Where there is no vision, the people perish.”
President Reagan’s 1984 “Morning in American” election ad evoked a renewed America moving out of late 70s “stagflation.” Reagan’s optimism helped him get re-elected. Reagan led with vision, and his party knows its power. A prominent activist in the conservative movement, Eric Heubeck, advocated for a renewal of a vision-based strategy in a 2001 memo:
We must win the people over culturally – by defining how man ought to act, how he ought to perceive the world around him, and what it means to live the good life. Political arrangements can only be formed after these fundamental questions have been answered.
Offer the vision
As David Bollier and Silke Helfrich put it in a brilliant essay about the rise of a commons-based society, “we are poised between an old world that no longer works and a new one struggling to be born.” Part of that struggle is that there’s no vision for what’s emerging. It’s not just that the old world doesn’t work anymore, it’s also that the old story that gave it meaning isn’t believable and there’s no credible story to replace it. The story of what our society is all about is actually up for grabs. There's no bigger "myth gap," as Story Wars author Jonah Sachs might put it. And there’s arguably no bigger opportunity for change.
The sharing community has two choices. It can ignore this opportunity. It can develop a narrow vision for the sharing economy and offer one among many competing visions. Or, it can develop a vision that shows how the sharing economy addresses the world’s greatest challenges and offers a new, inspiring way forward for society. We have the opportunity to develop the vision, the one that defines “what it means to live the good life.”
Is the sharing economy qualified to be the vision? Yes, I believe so. In fact, I don’t think there’s anything else that can radically reduce poverty and resource consumption at the same time, something humans must do to stabilize our global climate and society.
However, the sharing economy is not only a real solution, it’s also an inspiring true story. People experience it as empowering. It puts people in a new, constructive relation to one another. In the sharing economy, we host, fund, teach, drive, care, guide and cook for friends and strangers alike. This is a world where people help each other. It’s also a world where self-interest and the common good align.
It’s no wonder people experience sharing as empowering. It’s how we raise children. It’s how we celebrate. It’s how we survive disasters. Sharing has played a crucial role in all of humanities greatest accomplishments, from the moon shot to the development of the Internet. Our economy depends on the commons. Business isn’t possible without nature’s bounty, taxpayer-funded infrastructure, and the sense making of culture. Nearly every religion teaches its wisdom. Sharing is bedrock to our well being, but it’s also the path to self-actualization.
Mythologist Joseph Campbell discovered a universal story found in every culture he called the hero’s journey. The hero’s only path to maturity is to leave home, undergo an enlightening ordeal, and bring back a gift to heal society. This dramatizes what we all know about heroes -- that they selflessly serve others. Sharing activates the hero archetype that’s in all of us. That’s why it resonates so deeply. And why we hold the deepest reverence for those that help others the most, from Jesus to Gandhi to Dr. King.
For all these reasons, the sharing community would be foolish not to go big on vision, to redefine what the good life means and how to get it. The epic crises we face call for real solutions. And citizens everywhere are desperate to see a real way out.
The vision must come from many
At Shareable, we cover the sharing economy as a paradigm shift in how we produce, consume, and govern. It includes startups like Airbnb, RelayRides and Loosecubes but is much bigger than them. There’s no question that the bulk of attention is currently going to this part of the sharing economy. As I mentioned, this group is coming together around regulatory concerns.
This is good. They can help each other. However, a vision of the sharing economy must come from a much broader coalition. A vision promoted by a small group of technology entrepreneurs who have billions of dollars in stock options collectively will seem self-serving. As with any message, the credibility of the messenger matters. While it was possible last century, a vision promoted by a narrow and privileged slice of our society can’t become the ordering vision of our day.
In order for that to happen, these companies should, after organizing themselves, help build a broad coalition working for economic democracy. They’d have a much better chance of getting what they want if they helped others get what they want. Such a group could include the coalition that defeated SOPA and PIPA, Code for America, the Freelancers Union, organizations working for progressive intellectual property laws like Public Knowledge, local economy advocates like BALLE, solidarity economy advocates like the New Economics Foundation, innovative nonprofits like The Public Banking Institute and The Participatory Budgeting Project, commons advocates On The Commons, the open education movement, Creative Commons, the National Cooperative Business Association, and more. Ideally, such a coalition would cut across sectors and political ideologies.
The dramatic transformation of the economy that’s needed is not going to happen until a large coalition begins to work together. All of the organizations I mentioned are focused on a small piece of a much larger puzzle that leads to the same thing – a more democratic economy. Unfortunately, the whole is currently less than the sum of the parts. Significant change will never come from such a disconnected group. However, if they came together to share an inspiring vision, they could pave the way for the regulatory reform needed to democratize the economy.
We’re at a critical juncture. Will the sharing community think small and eventually fade into obscurity as trends do, or will we go on an arduous yet fulfilling hero’s journey to heal society?
I’m in it for the journey. How about you?
Rate this article
Comments
Neal - we're in at BALLE too... :) ~ Michelle Long, BALLE executive director
Hi Sepp, I like the ethics behind your proposal, but I tend to think that the guarantees should be on the cost side rather than the income side. For instance, instead of taking a tiny fraction of the housing stock out of the speculative market, take most of it out (preferably in a variety of ways including community land trusts, limited equity coop house, subsidies, state ownership). This way, life costs a lot less and would reduce the need for income.
My issue is that a guaranteed income could get compromised by escalating costs of all kinds, from housing to food to transportation. And that a guaranteed income could actually contribute to rising cost of living.
Neal, have you read 'The Resilience Imperative: Co-operative Transitions to a Steady-State Economy'?
In it, they include some basic back of the envelope working out (using figures from real life projects) of how an average modern family would fair if;
* the land their house was on was part of a community land trust
* their mortgage was fee-based rather than compound interest-based (like how the JAK Bank works)
* they have loft/ cavity wall insulation
They then add how much extra income they'd have to spend to fairly pay farmers for growing local organic food and work out roughly how much more time people would have by not having to work as much.
In short, over 25 years the average Canadian family (the book is published by New Society Publishers in Canada) would save: $447,313 Canadian dollars which based on average incomes equates to saving 14,910 hours of life energy.
Works for me, I'm in :)
One of the greatest visions, which I can imagine. Comes from (among many other independent sources with same aim!) Buckminster Fuller's World Peace Game - "make the world work for 100% of humanity in the shortest possible time through spontaneous cooperation without ecological damage or disadvantage to anyone"
Myself I work on aligning my efforts to emphasize this aim, as on example of http://hackers4peace.net . I also feel happy to see more and more independent initiatives taking such direction.
On of greatest challenges I see in broad network of Sharing Economy initiatives - COMPETITION, which doesn't support playing for EVERYONE WINS scenario.
Currently I have impression that people from for example http://blablacar.com may feel uncomfortable with supporting efforts of people from http://carpooling.com or http://liftshare.com Similar I wouldn't find it surprising if people working on http://airbnb.com not only don't support but possibly even don't wish success to projects like http://knok.com . I feel afraid that I could keep going on enumerating tens or hundreds cases like those :(
As one of ACTs of good will to collaborate, I would see open sourcing code bases of all those platforms. Collaborating on making them inter-operable, and making easy for people to participate in any number of those networks at the same time. I look forward to first OuiShare hackathon which hopefully we can make happen during our summit in Rome two weeks from now. Juho Makkonen, who works on open source http://sharetribe.com and wrote here on shareable article titled 'API for sharing', will join it as well and I believe that together we can start making first steps in direction of interoperability of sharing&collaboration services.
Somehow hearing about issues with topics like local laws etc. which we don't have such a great direct influence on. I wanted to put some emphasis on this challenge of *transcending competitive attitude*, which we have possibility of working with more directly. And grand vision of "making it work for EVERYONE" could help us to share our work and find harmony in our collaboration.
@Sepp @Neal "rising cost of living" ?!
If we look separate at our actual needs/wants in terms of material goods and services - food, housing, health care, mobility, learning opportunities etc. they don't change over time in radical way. On other hands very speculative and gamed monetary currencies distort our perception leading to IMO false impression of "rising cost of living".
The more of our real needs/wants we can secure by sharing & collaboration, the less we depend on monetary systems (especially the one mainstream at present!) While I like intentions and motivation behind what people describe as *basic income*, attempt to implementing it around present finances I consider a wishful thinking. I hope more people will start looking on using more sophisticated information systems then monetary currencies for implementing let's say *basic existential pack*...
If we just look at how much people waste at present ex. >50% of produced food in Northern America and Europe, similar with unused living spaces and daemonising squatting. We can meet many (most?) requirement of such *basic existential pack* with more conscious way of participation in flows of resources, on both consumer & producer side (+prosumer). Here relatively recent technologies like Linked Data (rel to concept of Web3.0) can come of use for creating more sophisticated information systems than IMO primitive finances!
http://youtu.be/OM6XIICm_qo (TED Talk, Tim Berners-Lee: The next Web of open, linked data)
Hi Elf, thanks for chiming in and reminding everyone of the power of cooperation. ShareTribe is indeed leading with their values by open sourcing their code base. Very cool!
On rising cost of living, here in the states important things like food, housing, education and healthcare have risen dramatically in the last decade. What adds to the problem is that wages and employment are stagnating and if not down during the same period.
Josef, thanks for that. I'm in too! Hey, do you know the authors? I'd like to excerpt that section or part of it for Shareable. Sounds sensible and feasible.
Thanks, Neal
Related Articles
- A Case of Global Coworking Serendipity
- From Green New Deal to New Economy
- Can Trust Systems Build a New Economy From Ruin?
- For All We'll Ever Need: A Family's Transformation
- Fear and Loathing in the Coworking Space
- What if Lena Dunham Coworked?
- A Coworkers Guide to Slaying Procrastination
- My Year of Coworking
- Is Social Entrepreneurship the Rich Saving the Poor?
- Coworking in the Ancient Town of Matera, Italy
Community Blog Posts
-
By Drew Little
-
By Tim West
-
By Liz Elam
Recent comments
-
13 hours 13 min ago
-
1 day 4 hours ago
-
1 day 15 hours ago
-
2 days 14 hours ago
-
2 days 15 hours ago




Just for an idea ... I would definitely start sharing in the money pie.
We're told to get a job if we want to eat. On the other hand, there are less and less jobs. Not just from outsourcing, also because more and more of our work is being done and will increasingly be done by computers and robots. Which makes it impossible for some to eat. Not proper. Share the wealth.
How to do it?
As a first step get everyone a decent basic income. There are several groups advocating this. Basic Income Guarantee is one of the search terms. Those groups should be part of the sharing vision. They are pulling in the same direction - a situation where no one lacks the basis for survival and there's enough to go around to make sharing a pleasure.