What will your most valuable asset be in the near future? Not a physical object or your bank account, as collaborative consumption champion Rachel Botsman would have it. It’s your reputation, online and off. In an age where people are doing an increasing amount of business with strangers through sites like Airbnb, being able to tell in advance that strangers will deliver as promised is becoming increasingly important.
But how does reputation get established?
In her recent TED talk, “Trusting In Strangers,” Botsman envisions a real-time stream of who has transacted with you online represented in a visual pattern to indicate to your trustworthiness to strangers.
TrustCloud is just such a tool, and has a lot of company these days in an increasingly crowded field (Legit, Scaffold, Trust.cc, etc.) that measures trust in a variety of ways. Looking at TrustCloud's homepage, there’s a cluster of familiar social media icons and other symbols on the TrustCard depicted there. What do they signify? Regarding Facebook, they say, “Your behavior can indicate you’re connected, transparent, and social.” Email and phone can be verified, confirming you’re a real person.
As this recent Wall Street Journal article details, a TrustCloud score functions in the sharing economy like a FICO score works in the credit economy. It's a 1,000 point score that can be displayed on profiles and blogs that serves as a proxy for trustworthiness in a variety of peer to peer transactions. It gives an algorithmic picture of who you are, functioning as a lubricant for increasingly prevalent peer to peer transactions online and off. As TrustCloud puts it:
"We measure your virtuous online behaviors and transactions to build a portable TrustScore you can easily use within the Sharing Economy."
If this movement is to reach beyond the already predisposed and out into the cautious, go-with-the-crowd mainstream, something like this must itself become a trusted standard, easily adopted by those that aren’t already tech savvy.
How can this happen?
TrustCloud explains its path there, directly addressing what we all are likely thinking:
“Trust is difficult to quantify– we’ve all heard the saying ‘I know trust when I see it.’ These days, however, there’s enough data generated from online activity to detect actual patterns of trustworthy behavior.”
They break it down into three layers: verification, behavior, and transaction.
The verification layer includes email, physical address and SMS verification. The behavior layer looks at who you are across social networks in an interesting way: “Our proprietary algorithms look for behaviors like responsiveness, consistency and longevity. In combination, these gestures speak volumes to how you behave online.” They wisely add, “Note -- we only work with your publicly-available data in these forums and never cross the privacy lines without your permission.” The transaction layer looks at your ratings on sites such as eBay, Trustcloud’s algorithms sifting out the gamed ratings.
With this, I think TrustCloud has all the ingredients to give people enough confidence to transact with strangers. Now it’s time to see how it gets out into the broader world, and if it becomes the go-to standard.
How do you gauge the trustworthiness of strangers? Do you think a score derived from an aggregation of online transactions would help? Please share in comments.
Rate this article
Comments
I don't know whether this is strictly neccessary, but I would welcome a disclaimer saying that Trustcloud is a sponsor, just to avoid confusions
Interesting that you use Botsman's Ted Global 2012 talk as the motivation for discussing TrustCloud. As I understood it, she argued AGAINST a single number method for aggregating trust like a FICO score, as you put it.
Quote from the Ted blog: "Aggregating online reputations across different sites is a massive challenge, and the next step isn’t adding up into one algorithm-derived number: “People’s lives are too complex and nuanced to do that.” Reputation is largely contextual — and finding a way to make that context clear and usable is the next big challenge." (http://blog.ted.com/2012/06/28/trusting-in-strangers-rachel-botsman-at-t...)
Hey Raj, thanks for the feedback. TrustCloud is indeed a sponsor. Paul arrived at his opinions independently, so I decided to let his post stand on its own instead of including it in our sponsored stream of content. Maybe I made a mistake. This is definitely a learning process as we as a nonprofit explore funding options. Open to your ideas.
Matt, Paul does end the piece with a question about whether TrustCloud's approach would be helpful or not. As to Rachel's ideas, she may be right, but I reserve the possibility that a useful proxy for trust is possible. I think it's a worthy experiment in any case. And the bottom line is that no one will really know until it's tried.
Neal Gorenflo
Publisher, Shareable
Related Articles
- Can Trust Systems Build a New Economy From Ruin?
- A Case of Global Coworking Serendipity
- Fear and Loathing in the Coworking Space
- What if Lena Dunham Coworked?
- A Coworkers Guide to Slaying Procrastination
- My Year of Coworking
- Adam Werbach Launches yerdle on Black Friday with 10,000 Free Items
- Coworking in the Ancient Town of Matera, Italy
- How to Earn $1000s as a Micro-entrepreneur Starting Now
- From Green New Deal to New Economy
Community Blog Posts
-
By Jordan Mann
-
By Kelcy Smith
Recent comments
-
2 hours 54 min ago
-
4 hours 31 min ago
-
8 hours 34 min ago
-
8 hours 36 min ago
-
13 hours 38 min ago




Nice work Paul.
Many of your points were central to my investment thesis in Sharing (and in TC itself). I've written about it extensively on Miles to Go- and I'll let you know how it works out!
With the confluence of Mobile, social and local, we are spending more of our time in front of digital devices, and rely on a "digital sense" to make real world decisions. Risky business to be sure, and the incidence(s) of risk are only growing.
But for my money, I'd prefer a snapshot to doing all the background work myself.
~~
Miles Spencer
Entrepreneur, angel, and adventurer.
Sometimes all at once.
More at http://www.milesspencer.com