No Limits To Happiness
Humans are motivated in their actions to satisfy needs. Needs are what drives people. People’s needs should also be what drives the economy. Starting from the needs of individuals and not starting from the needs of an economic theory or the needs of a financial system.
So, what do we need? Abraham Maslow, an American psychologist studied the human needs and is most remembered for the hierarchy of needs. The hierarchy of needs is most commonly presented as follows:

The more basic needs like housing and food are at the bottom of this hierarchy. When we fulfill these basic needs we can move on toward higher needs like friendship and community all the way toward the fulfillment of spiritual and creative needs.

PROGRESS
Progress brings economic efficiencies that make it possible to create more with fewer resources and less time ( e.g inventions like the wheel, the engine, the computer and productivity gains in general). This should make it possible to fulfill more needs with less effort. This makes it possible to narrow the bottom in our hierarchy of needs.

MORE NEEDS FULFILLED WITH LESS
For instance, technologies like the Internet have transformed access to information, music and communication and have created many options for our creative needs.
These new technologies are a boost to producers of knowledge, music, video and entertainment. We can now become creators with little capital. We could, as an example, start an Internet comedy channel from our basement with a potential global audience. Equipment like basic cameras that would have been professional equipment a generation ago are now available for amateurs, hobbyists and professionals alike.
This is an opening to self-actualization made possible by our progress: the success of entrepreneurial activities and technological advances that liberate resources, effort and time.

Individuals who have a drive toward higher needs, such as artistic pursuit, are motivated to narrow the ‘basics’ bottom of this hierarchy of needs and liberate time and resources to become creators. They will satisfy the basic needs like housing and food in such a way that they can concentrate on their creations or artistic expression. A similar process will take place for someone with spiritual needs, intellectual needs or other higher needs. At the end of this process the hierarchy would look more like this.

The efficient satisfaction of the lower needs leaves more room for the fulfillment of the higher needs like community, confidence and self-actualization and toward an unlimited reservoir of higher needs.
A CONUNDRUM
But our economic theory, with a need for monetary growth, runs into conflict with the human needs for growth. Once the basic needs are met we can either keep expanding them or we can move on to higher needs. In general, these higher needs require less money. Our needs for friendship, community and spiritual needs are less monetary. The result is a conflict between our money system that needs to create more money in order to sustain itself and the individuals who want to grow toward higher levels of prosperity that are less money oriented.
The process toward personal growth is disturbed by outside influences that create more wants for the same basic needs. These wants are materialistic and their creation is motivated by economic profit. Advertising and marketing is mostly aimed at stretching our motivations towards the satisfaction of the lower and more basic needs.

By the fixation on monetarily-intensive lower needs, there is less room for growth into the higher needs. We are stuck. By stretching the pyramid more horizontally we stay on a basic level instead of growing to higher levels that are often less monetary. Over the last decades, in the United States, we have been building super sized houses while smaller houses are sufficient to meet our housing needs. This has created higher mortgage and utility payments. The result is that we are stuck in extended basic needs; more ‘need’ for income and resources and thus work and time. This results in less time and resources for other higher needs like going for a walk in the park to enjoy nature or taking the time to find and read an inspiring book or spend time with family or friends.

AWARENESS
With awareness we can actively pursue our own interest in having a more fulfilling life. Without awareness, we could be guided by outside forces to a life as a consumer of only the basics.
Billions of dollars each year are spent to influence our decisions and it is not easy to escape their influence. Without this influence would millions of people make the choice to live under perpetual debt? Would millions of us choose to be obese or diabetic? Unfortunately there is less marketing and advertising to promote our higher needs. That promotion has to come from within.
NO LIMITS TO GROWTH (no limits to personal growth - no limits to people prosperity)
The current conditions of progress should allow for a pyramid structure that looks like this:

The pyramid is now open-ended at the top with no limits to growth. There is no end in sight for the growth so we might as well enjoy the process. Progress and the productivity gains of the last centuries make it possible to fulfill the basic needs with less time and resources. The higher needs like friendship, community and spirituality are mostly non monetary and non-material.
By presenting progress in an open ended upside down pyramid, there is no longer a feeling that each higher level is for fewer and fewer people or just for an elite. It is wide open for all of us. There is more room higher up than at the bottom. There is no scarcity on the higher levels as community, spirituality and relationships have no natural or monetary limitations. We benefit from each other’s progress and this contributes toward the sharing economy (with .....no limits to growth).
Rate this article
Comments
Thanks so much for this informative, simple and yet profound approach to the pursuit of happiness and fulfillment. My husband and I down-sized this year to the smallest place we have lived in for over 20 years. We are so happy here! We now have so much more time to enjoy life! Through our family-owned business we are now working to educate the masses about the joys of a life in which you can spend more time with friends and family and open your life to building trusting relationships with strangers around the globe! Life is good!
Jule'
Rik,
Thanks for a beautiful presentation in both aesthetic and simplicity.
Personally, I am a creator, in your terms, who has made the choice to invert my personal pyramid. Years ago, I traded the opportunity for a six figure income for satisfying higher needs. I live on less than $12,000 per year personal income, while my days are extraordinarily rich with learning, love and meaning. I started up a livelihood development cooperative, now with members in 26 countries that helps individuals, particularly in marginalized communities, to make the life they want to live. Through sharing and collaboration.
Maslow's pyramid, while powerful, is individualistic, not relational, in its epistemological assumptions. It is based on the idea that our needs are centered on our individual needs. What I have learned from serving a community with many whose families live on less than $5/day is that the logic of the pyramid story doesn't make sense when the container of needs is relational.
In a relational culture, when one has capital to spend, one first is concerned with taking care of basic needs of a large family and extended relations. The idea of "choice" between self-actualization and clean water doesn't ....well... hold water ;-) because your obligation is to family and community first.
So, I have been in an inquiry of collaborative value creation, transforming the pyramid into a spiral, from a goal orientation to a process orientation.
Thanks for sharing!
Tiffany von Emmel
Dreamfish
http://dreamfish.com
Tiffany,
Thank you for your comment. Thank you for sharing that it is possible to have a ‘rich’ live on $12.000/year. (we just solved the ‘economic’ crises)
I take the opportunity to respond to two points. That Maslow’s hierarchy is individualistic and that we can not self-actualize when we do not have clean water (that we need to satisfy the lower needs first).
As far as I can tell, Maslow did not present the process toward self-actualization in a hierarchy but as a process. Like, when we take care of the basic needs like water, food, housing, etc. then what? ... what then? well...then new needs will manifest themselves.
We would first have to satisfy the basic needs before you can move on to higher needs. Otherwise regress will be likely. If the best artist has no food or housing, we might never get to see the work. In a society where we meet most of our basic needs with a certain form of money, we can witness the consequences when we run out of that money.
In my opinion, satisfying your own needs does not contradict to contributing to the community. Even the sharing might have an individualistic motive. 100 years ago, in small communities, members of the community would help each other. Farmers would work for their family, but if a member of the community was hit by bad luck, the other farmers would help with the harvest. But there was a a sort of understanding that the favor would be returned if one day, they had some bad luck. There is not always a contradiction between individual needs and community needs. I believe that is a product of modern times. Also what we use as the medium of exchange, our money as we now use it in our society, has contributed to the separation between the needs of the individual and the needs of the community. Especially in times like these when there is not enough medium of exchange for the needs. Could it be that the individualistic interpretation is a product of our current western (economic) thinking. That what you witness in your work resembles more the communities as they existed pre-industrialization?
What if Hieronymus Bosch, Brueghel or even Dali did not have the support of their family and community to meet their basic needs. We would not be able to enjoy their work and get a snapshot of live in a different time. When someone has a special talent, the community will support this individual to self-actualize, but the result will be that the community will get something in return.
Your work is already beyond Maslow with ‘collaborative value creation, transforming the pyramid into a spiral, from a goal orientation to a process orientation’. My concern is that our society as a whole is still looking for the old ‘economic growth’, while we need another ‘growth’.
Rik
Dear Rik,
Thank you very much for such a clear description of where we could all be. I was most interested that your article started with the need for self actualisation (mine would too!) which is probably why we spend our time thinking about these types of things! As Maslow himself said 'musician must make music, an artist must paint, a poet must write, if he is ultimately to be at peace with himself..'
For me, I accept that the reason I am free to consider this 'highest' tier is because in a relative sense i'm pretty much OK on with the lower tiers. However an increasingly large proportion of us (humans) aren't.
I'm wondering whether the speed and pace of life has meant that we've adapted to take short cuts that have distorted our understanding of what it actually is that we need. I get a sense of I see it, I want it therefore I must need it conditioning our behaviour. This instant thinking provides low level answers and creates illusions of need. Surely this process needs to undergo a process of chunking up - 'If you had X what would that give you?' or 'What is that an example of?' I'm sure if we were developing a computer software programme we would include this stage in the decision making programme..!
Anyway, my point is, I can't imagine that Maslow nearly 70 years ago could possibly have know how far from understanding ourselves and our environment we have become. It's almost as if the human he was describing has changed, disconnected from itself in a way. The result is a significant and growing proportion of the population who are not getting their Deficiency Needs met (esteem, friendship, love, security and physical). The evidence is in the health of the population both physical and mental.
My view is that the responsibility to tackle this now lies with those of us who are going for our Being Needs. The concept of the sharing economy is a vital first step in turning this around, especially for the environment and to flip the triangle that you illustrated in your post. My concern is that we also need to address the serious lack of human to human contact and by that I mean face to face. Maybe I'm wrong maybe virtual relationships will satisfy the human needs outlined by Maslow but I don't think so. The evidence is that the younger generation are suffering with a lack of human contact and the benefits that contact brings. All of us need help in achieving the process of self actualisation and i believe that this process needs to be initiated in the real world with real people who understand us and care about us.
OK, you guessed I'm a digital migrant, in fact this is my first ever comment on someone else's blog!
That's all from sunny UK (actually it's pouring and has been for the last two weeks - how English is that?!) and above all thanks for SHARING!
Jessie
Jessie Paterson
Welcome, Jessie! Honored to have Shareable be the spot for your first-ever comment on someone else's blog!
Happiness comes to them who opens their door for small treats that life provides to them. So be happy and live longer!
Related Articles
- A Case of Global Coworking Serendipity
- Can Trust Systems Build a New Economy From Ruin?
- Fear and Loathing in the Coworking Space
- What if Lena Dunham Coworked?
- A Coworkers Guide to Slaying Procrastination
- My Year of Coworking
- Coworking in the Ancient Town of Matera, Italy
- Adam Werbach Launches yerdle on Black Friday with 10,000 Free Items
- It's Time to Go Big: A Vision for the Sharing Economy
- From Green New Deal to New Economy
Community Blog Posts
-
By Drew Little
-
By Tim West
-
By Liz Elam
Recent comments
-
11 hours 41 min ago
-
17 hours 1 min ago
-
17 hours 2 min ago
-
17 hours 27 min ago
-
21 hours 14 min ago




I'm really glad you explained this in such a way that I can pass it on. My husband and I have been doing this for the past year and we really couldn't put our finger on why, but this hits the nail on the head. As creative professionals, we find our material possessions and such distracting, particularly my husband. He's even realized that as a barefoot runner, removing the 'shoe barrier' increases his creativity, because he is more connected to the environment around him. Sounds weird, but removing some of these outside pressures really does make an impact.