Five Things Every Mayor Should Know Before Starting a Bike Sharing Program
02.15.11, 11:07am Comments (6)

Bike sharing is a two-wheeled transit service — call it bike transit — which started in 1965 in Amsterdam and has since spread to nearly 250 communities around the world. The service allows individuals to rent a bike from one of many unattended stations, or docking points, and return it to any station. Before implementing a bike-sharing service, it’s important for public officials and staff to consider the following:

1) Be a bike-friendly community first.
Your community should be bike-friendly first with a dense network of bike facilities such as cycle tracks, bike lanes, and trails. This network of bike facilities will enable bicycle riders and your future bike-sharing customers to easily and safely travel through your community by bike. The League of American BicyclistsBicycle Friendly America Yearbook offers examples of what other communities have done to become bike-friendly. Communities with bike-sharing services also have high Bicycle Friendly Community ratings and include: Arlington, VA (silver), Washington, D.C. (bronze), Minneapolis (silver), and Denver (bronze). Before implementing a bike-sharing service, a community should be at least a bronze-level Bicycle Friendly Community.


A  Capital Bikeshare station.

2) Bike-sharing is not cheap, so secure sufficient funding.
By implementing a bike-sharing service, you’re launching a new transit service. It may be less expensive to purchase and operate than a bus or rail service, but sufficient funding is required to make it successful. While the types of bike-sharing systems vary, costs can be up to $5,000 per bike for capital, and operating expenses can range from $100-200 per bike per year. A service with a couple hundred — or thousand — bikes is pricey. However, while implementing a service is not cheap, bike-sharing can be a cost-effective public transportation option.

3) Size and density matter.
A bus service with a solitary bus or just a couple of stops will only be accessible to a limited number of people — those living, working, or playing near the stops. The same can be said for bike-sharing, as the greater the number of bikes and the wider the network of stations translates into a more successful service. Station density should be such that a customer can find a station every couple of blocks. In fact, a bike-sharing service’s usefulness will increase exponentially with each additional station, as each station expands the reach of your service by better connecting places into this new transit system.

4) Build public-private partnerships.
Bike-sharing lends itself to public-private partnerships. Private organizations can assist the implementing agency by sponsoring the service or purchasing a station for outside their worksite. They also find bike-sharing good for providing their employees a healthy commuting option, making their location more accessible to customers, being environmentally friendly, and promoting a green service. The public benefits by having some of the costs of buying and operating a service covered by private organizations. Whether the implementing agency is a local government or non-profit, both have successfully taken advantage of sponsorship to help expand their service’s reach. Barclays Bank sponsored Barclays Cycle Hire in London to the tune of $40 million; BlueCross BlueShield of Minnesota sponsored Nice Ride Minnesota in Minneapolis with $1.75 million and has offered up to a $1.5 million match for expansion of the service. For bike-sharing implementers, private engagement can expand a service in a cost-efficient way — creating a win-win for both parties.


A Melbourne Bike Share station.

5) Don’t do it alone, work regionally.
Bike-sharing can produce the greatest benefits when done regionally, which is why the Paris and Washington, D.C. areas have regional services. For commuting trips, bike-sharing is ideal for the first-mile/last-mile challenge of getting folks to and from longer haul transit services. Implementing a service takes a lot of work, but sharing the workload, and expenses among multiple jurisdictions is a great deal. Additionally, it’s important that jurisdictions within a region have the same, compatible service, so riding from one jurisdiction to another is smooth and makes for a pleasant customer experience.

With the number of bike-sharing services in the U.S. and worldwide rapidly increasing each year, bike-sharing has proven effective at serving the public well for short urban trips, as well as complementing other modes of transit. However, like any other transit mode, there are pitfalls — both shared with other transit modes and unique to bike-sharing — which should be avoided to ensure a successful, well-used service. Following this advice will get your jurisdiction rolling in the right direction.

Paul DeMaio is the founder of the bike-sharing consultancy MetroBike, LLC and co-author of The Bike-sharing Blog.

Rate this article

Your rating: None Average: 5 (3 votes)

Comments

Funny that you show a picture of the full racks of bikes in Melbourne but don't mention why they are almost always full. In the first six months, the share still barely has any riders. January (mid-summer, reasonably fine weather) saw only 10,000 rides (meaning 600 bikes, each ridden once every 2 days). The bikes are slightly too expensive (in my opinion).

Mostly, everybody pretends that the mandatory helmet laws are not a problem (even resorting to putting in vending machines to sell $5 helmets) but it is quite obvious it is a crippling impediment. For Brisbane's scheme, it is probably too early to tell if it is also facing the same problem (the flooding won't help either), but indications are that they also struggling.

$5000 per bike!

It takes about $5000 to get a bike collective started and each of those gets hundreds of people on bikes each year, both teaching people how to fix the dusty flat bikes they already own and refurbishing the abandoned bikes that are left around the city. These organizations have done just as much for increasing bike transit as any token half a billion dollar bike program has. Here's a list of all the bike collective in us and around the world: http://www.bikecollectives.org/wiki/index.php?title=Community_Bicycle_Or...

Cris, would you or perhaps someone in your community like to write about bike coops for Shareable?

You makes some great points, and we should strive to bring our community into the world of bike coops to understand their benefits (and also how to set one up).

Thanks for the awesome link!

-Neal

1 is wrong. Bike share can be the starting point of a bike friendly community. Paris was a bike desert before velib began. Now they have tons of bike-specific features on their roads.

Same with Mexico City. Bike share came and THEN the curb-separated bike lanes arrived.

Bike share solves the problem of "why build bike infrastructure if nobody bikes?"

Cris, the bikes themselves cost around $1,000. $5,00 includes all the other costs (station, trucks, warehouse etc) spread out on a per-bike basis.

My point isn't that bike shares are not a good starting point to create cycle culture. My point is that Australia once again shows the world why mandatory helmet laws are a bad idea. The scheme in Melbourne was pushed forward without considering the helmet question. The comparison between Dublin who launched a similar sized scheme in a fairly bike unfriendly city compared to Melbourne which is reasonably bike friendly is very instructive.

Dublin's scheme is booming and preparing to expand while Melbourne's is struggling to gain many riders. The recent incoming state government is starting to make noises about the expense of the scheme and how much it costs to subsidize the $5 helmet band-aid. I fear the whole scheme is going to be left to wilt away and die.

Kerry, thanks for clarifying. That's a really interesting dilemma with no easy answer.

One answer is to just make biking much safer in cities regardless if you wear a helmet or not. I'm guessing the biggest danger to bikers is cars, and I'm not sure how much a helmet helps is you're hit by one.

MetroBike, LLC is North America’s first bike-sharing consulting company and the leader of the nascent field. MetroBike’s clients include local and federal governments, non-profits, for-profits, and universities in the U.S. and abroad.

Bike-sharing, or bike transit, is a fleet of bicycles available at a network of unattended stations for short-term use. The concept has been gaining popularity in recent years with successful programs throughout Europe and which is now expanding rapidly to other parts of the world. Successful bike-sharing programs increase bike mode share and personal mobility, decrease pollution, complement existing transit by better reaching underserved locations in a low-cost manner, and provide customers the added benefit of exercise. MetroBike can assist your organization on your bike-sharing consulting needs.