I'm here at the Urban Land Institute expo in San Francisco with thousands of real estate agents, developers, urban planners, architects, bankers, public officials--and I'm learning a lot, some of which I'll be writing about at Shareable.net next week.
In the meantime, I thought I'd share the news, some of it surprising, from the real estate industry:
- These folks care about sustainability and walkability...now, anyway. Ten years ago, according to many participants I interviewed, sustainability was not on the agenda. They couldn't get a ULI committee started. They couldn't even get ULI to publish studies on the topic--too controversial. Today, I have not heard one person say that density scares people away or that sustainability kills jobs; quite the opposite. The question at hand, in almost every panel and discussion, is: how can we achieve density and sustainability, in the face of regulation that encourages sprawl and residents who think density hurts the environment?
- Along those lines, quite a few planners and developers have told me that local environmentalists can be the biggest obstacle to achieving density --and thus sustainability. "People are against density because they believe that more people grouped together have more environmental impact," one planner told me. This belief is actually the opposite of the truth: shrinking the space that individual humans occupy reduces their carbon footprint--not to mention the size of their lawns, which need fertilizer and water, and the amount of garbage they generate. Many planners and architects are preoccupied with how to educate environmental and citizen groups about the many benefits of density.
- First-time, Generation Y homebuyers are driving demand for walkable, sustainable, transit-oriented houses and neighborhoods--along with immigrants, who are often accustomed to high density in their home countries. Note: Gen Y is the largest generation of Americans in history, 80 million strong, and immigrants are the ones driving population growth in the US. These market forces are partially what's put density and sustainability on the front-burner for ULI's membership. These were major issues in panel discussions.
- Public transit is coming back to Los Angeles in a big way. I say "coming back" because it turns out that LA had an extensive light rail system until 1963, when it was dismantled. However, since 1980, voters have been approving money to build transit and there is $2 billion is in the bank right now now for building an extensive public transit system. The effort still face huge obstacles--LA's public transit system sprawling and disjointed, it still only serves small part, and most places still require a car to get to--but the region is a hotbed for transit development right now.
Bottom line: Demand, technology, and the regulatory environment are converging to make shareable buildings, neighborhoods, and cities more desirable. As one speaker pointed out, “nearly half of what will be in the built environment in 2030 doesn’t even exist yet, giving the current generation a real opportunity to reshape the future of development.”
Rate this article
Comments
I didn't say anything about the ULI being a pure force for good, only that after years of resisting green building and sustainable regulation, the membership and the organization seems to be grappling in a deep, serious way with how to build greener cities. This evolution wasn't spurred by a sense of virtue, but by a changing marketplace and regulatory environment. That's news, and that's the imperfect, complicated world we live in, where interests and values compete but we still have to find a way to work together.
We're going to have to agree to disagree about density. I think people should live in shareable human habitats, and hop on trains to visit the nature that surrounds their cities.
Jeremy Adam Smith
www.jeremyadamsmith.com
Just so we understand each other. Red herring arguments aside. Caps are not yelling just responses to specifics.
I didn't say anything about the ULI being a pure force for good, only that after years of resisting green building and sustainable regulation, the membership and the organization seems to be grappling in a deep, serious way with how to build greener cities.
THEY "SEEM TO BE" BECAUSE IT IS THE NEW LANGUAGE THAT THEY CAN APPROPRIATE TO CONTINUE TO OVERBUILD THE INFRASTRUCTURE WE LIVE ON. THE CONSEQUENCES ARE INFRASTRUCTURE FAILURE, HIGH TAXES, AND REDUCED QUALITY OF LIFE.
This evolution wasn't spurred by a sense of virtue, but by a changing marketplace and regulatory environment. That's news, and that's the imperfect, complicated world we live in, where interests and values compete but we still have to find a way to work together.
I THINK IT IS BECOMING OBVIOUS THAT THERE REALLY ARE GOOD GUYS AND BAD GUYS, AND WE DON'T HAVE TO WORK WITH BAD GUYS. THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR NEW STARTS, AND NEW JOBS, BY A WHOLE NEW SET OF RESPONSIBLE, MORAL, ETHICAL, PLAYERS IS WHAT MANY OF US ARE WORKING TOWARD.
We're going to have to agree to disagree about density. I think people should live in shareable human habitats, and hop on trains to visit the nature that surrounds their cities.
I NEVER SAID I REJECT DENSITY. THERE IS APPROPRIATE DENSITY CONSISTENT WITH CARRYING CAPACITY. DENSITY ISN'T JUST PLACING MONOPOLY PIECES ON A GRID. YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THE COMPLEXITY OF HUMAN SETTLE MENT.
As I said, we're going to have to agree to disagree.
Jeremy Adam Smith
www.jeremyadamsmith.com
Jeremy,
Thanks for the catchy title! As a real estate agent dedicated to sharing resources and the deeper green necessity of cooperation, I was glad to hear of something positive regarding my challenging profession. I would appreciate the opportunity to reflect upon the issues that arise in the quest that my self, my business partner, and our clients face as we attempt to evolve the the actual practice of real estate into one that actually cares about the earth we "sell."
Can I email you offline? or shall I do some writing in this comment area?
Thank you,
Cassandra
p.s. I met Neal at Bioneers. I love this site!
Hi Cassandra, great to hear from you. We're publishing an essay next week by Janelle Orsi called "The Slow Homes Manifesto" that I think you're really going to like, and which addresses a lot of these issues in a very hopeful, forward-looking way. Shoot me an email: jeremy (at) shareable.net.
Jeremy Adam Smith
www.jeremyadamsmith.com
I didn't say anything about the ULI being a pure force for good, only that after years of resisting green building and sustainable regulation, the membership and the organization seems to be grappling in a deep, serious way with how to build greener cities.
Related Articles
- Interviewed: David Harvey on Rebel Cities
- Hurricane Sandy, Public Banks and Urban Resilience
- How to Map the New Economy in Your City
- Have Your Cake & Eat Someone Else's Too!
- Is Peer-to-Peer Bikesharing Viable?
- Harvesting the City
- Asheville: A Shareable Mountain Town
- Adventures in SideCar-ing
- Honest Buildings: Greener Real Estate by Sharing Data
- Complete Streets Are For Everyone: the Top 10 Policies of 2012
Community Blog Posts
-
By Drew Little
-
By Tim West
-
By Liz Elam
Recent comments
-
1 hour 27 min ago
-
3 hours 51 min ago
-
5 hours 10 min ago
-
5 hours 47 min ago
-
6 hours 2 min ago




Whoa big fellow. Before you sleep with the devil let's get some language straight. When ULI supports increased density it is because of the following situation: Many cities zoning codes have resulted in what (in the industry) is called "built out". That is to say that cities, analyze their infrastructure's "carrying capacity" and determine that the water, roads, schools, safety (police, fire), capacity of their city has been met. "Environmentalists" have been on the side of limiting increasing pressure on the grid. ULI opposes them and now has a convenient argument in density equals efficiency. Don't believe it for a minute.. If you go to a town meeting wherein ULI has been brought in as a consultant to the city, and stay long enough to see the suits line up beside them, you will get a very different picture of your new friends, the ones who brought you the current economic collapse. They need to build to stay alive and they will sink us all in the process.