We seemed to have painted ourselves into a corner. See, wealth in the global economy depends on economic growth. Stocks, bonds, and real estate only maintain or increase in value if the economy grows. But the economy can't grow forever in a finite ecosystem without eventually destroying it.
So the strange circumstance we find ourselves is this. Our wealth gets wiped out if the economy doesn't grow. And it gets wiped out if it does, taking us along with it.
There's gotta be a way out.
There is. The folks at the Center for the Steady State Economy (CASSE) have another game we can play. It's called steady state economics. A steady state economy:
- Fluctuates slightly around a stable size
- Maintains itself within its ecological limits
- Focuses us on the good life instead of more stuff
- Leaves a healthy planet and economy to future generations
- Makes room for developing nations to raise living standards
In short, it's an economy that can help us share the planet. You can read more about it here.
The folks at CASSE have a position statement that CommonSource, the nonprofit publisher of Shareable, has signed. We urge you to sign it too.
The economy of the future is far from worked out, though CASSE has some promising ideas. What's certain is that we need to grow out of a growth economy.
Teaser image courtesy of sebastiandavies.
Rate this article
Related Articles
- Occupy as a New Societal Model & Ways To Improve It
- Crowdfunding Social Change
- Play a Game to Find Pathways Out of Poverty
- Time to Occupy the Calendar
- Living Without Money is an Act of Community
- 5 Ways Sharing Can Help You Live A Low-Impact Life
- Ezio Manzini on the Economics of Design for Social Innovation
- Design for Social Innovation: An Interview With Ezio Manzini
- Participatory Budgeting Gains Steam in San Francisco
- Can Coworking and City Governments Partner?
Community Blog Posts
-
By Jay Cousins
-
By Nipun Mehta
-
By Rik Crevits
Recent comments
-
5 hours 44 min ago
-
15 hours 48 min ago
-
1 day 13 hours ago
-
1 day 13 hours ago
-
2 days 1 hour ago



The end of growthism is far too reasonable to the average hamster-on-a-wheel to comprehend, so there will be much resistance to steady-state concepts, and much more destruction of nature in the future.