How to Share the Big Stuff
03.11.11, 6:19am Comments (3)

Some of the most valuable assets in private ownership such as holiday homes, second (or third or fourth) cars, boats, motorhomes and horses are also unfortunately often an insane waste of resources. Many owners have great difficulty using them often enough to keep them in good condition. They finally sell them because the time, cost and hassle of maintaining them are greater than the joy of owning them. But if you love sailing, riding, flying etc, nothing beats the pleasure of owning your own boat, horse or aircraft. However it’s just as much fun if you share it with a few people, in fact it’s usually more fun.

I’ve learnt many things over the five years of running yours2share, but it still surprises me that the list of items for discussion when a sharing arrangement is created varies little with the asset: it could be a house or a horse. The potential partners in a private syndicate need to discuss and agree every aspect at the beginning and whatever they agree should be written into the contract. This discussion and negotiation is a critical aspect of the sharing process. The potential partners learn whether than can discuss and agree issues with each other, whether they are suitably like-minded and whether they have compatible requirements. If they are unhappy about any of these three factors, they should politely make their excuses and leave. No-one has to share these non-essential items.

Taking shared ownership of horse and house as the example, these issues include:

  • Who owns what? Is it a 50/50 split? Or four equal quarter shares? Horses for competition are often owned by an investor and a trainer/rider with the trainer having only (say) a 20% share. Is the asset owned via a company?
  • How to end the arrangement (exit strategy). For both horses (competitive) and houses, a common answer is to agree a date in the future when it will be sold. If the owners arrive at that date and all want to continue, they simply amend the contract to a future date. This also gives everyone a clear idea of when they can withdraw their equity. There are several other related issues to be agreed such as valuation, inheritance and forced sales.
  • Meetings and management: the more owners, the more important this is. It can be relatively flexible up to four or five owners, but it’s good to agree the date of an annual meeting and the items that will always be on the agenda. With many owners, agreeing the management process at the ourset is essential and it is worth considering employing someone to manage the sharing arrangement.
  • The costs and how they are divided: this could be according to the ownership split but there are often other factors.
  • What happens if one sharer damages the house or injures the horse? Work out who pays for what in various scenarios bearing in mind the insurance requirements, policy and costs.
  • Are there any qualifications that the sharer must have? How do you prove that they are a competent rider, pilot, skipper, driver? Property is one of few major asset types that doesn’t generally require competency to be proved. However if the property requires major renovation and the partners intend to do this themselves, it would be wise to ensure that everyone has the requisite skills, equal willingness to do it, and works at the same quality level.
  • Who can use it? For a house this could be just the sharer, their immediate family, friends, acquaintances, strangers, will it be rented out? For competition horses, there may be several trainers and jockeys/riders. For leisure/hacking horses, it is usually only the sharers.
  • How are you going to agree the fittings and fixtures? If you have to furnish a house, you need to have similar taste, and decide how to you are going to choose every item. Taste isn’t such an issue for horses, but the owners may decide to buy a horse box for transporting to competition.
  • Handover: what has to be done at the beginning and end of a sharers period of use and what is done by others. For houses it is often wise to have a cleaner/housekeeper come in between sharers. For horses, particularly leisure use, picking up poo and grooming are often tasks done by each sharer, but can be provided by the stable yard.

These are just a taste of the main sharing issues to be discussed: you can find a fuller version here.

I know that some people who are struggling to live on low incomes may consider sharing holiday homes or motor yachts a bit frivolous. But I think it is worth encouraging everyone at all levels of society to share more.

  • The more middle income families share things, the more mainstream and accepted sharing becomes.
  • People aspire to enjoy and own these “toys”: sharing is an enjoyable and responsible way of achieving this.
  • As more and more people share, the environmental and social benefits are substantial. The impact of fewer second homes and fewer boats has some major advantages. In the UK, where land is limited, the high number of second home owners, and thus the high cost of housing in some areas, has caused real friction with people who want to live there permanently. Worldwide there is a shortage of marina space, and yet building new marinas is often very damaging to the marine environment.
  • Sharing encourages owners to buy better quality items, which last longer and are often more pleasurable to use.

But most of all, we all benefit if people come together to create communities around these assets. Every time I speak to people in well run private syndicates I’m told that their fellow owners are a wonderful group of people: it's the community aspect and shared responsibility that people value the most.

Rate this article

Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Comments

Great post Sophie! Shared ownership is by far the most economical way to gain access to the finer things in life. Why pay for 100% of something you'll use only a few days a month? The simple logic is inescapable. I would also suggest thought that shared ownership makes sense for more than just big-ticket luxury items, and is a great option whenever you have an infrequent but long-term need for an item. A lawn mower is the perfect example. You'll use it only a few hours a week, but likely for several years. Of course, you can rent a lawn mower from someone in your neighborhood with a service like Snap Goods, but over time you'll end up paying more than the cost of the mower itself.

Here's a concrete example. I can get a lawn mower on Snap Goods for $5 a day. Assuming I'm in a warm climate and I mow once a week year round, I'll spend $260 per year to mow my lawn. If I can instead find 4 other people in my neighborhood to get together and purchase a mower, I can get a top of the line self-propelled mower (a $700 value) for $140 - much less than I would have spent to rent one. Assuming I get 3 years of use out of the mower before I have to replace it, the rental cost would have been $780 vs the $140 to own it. So essentially I can spend $140, or I can rent, spend $780, and in three years I'll pay for someone else's lawn mower and have nothing to show for it.

The same logic applies to a host of other moderately priced items, like a good SLR camera, a nice bicycle, camping equipment, etc… The other benefit of shared ownership is that you can be sure that people wont abuse the item because they actually have an ownership stake in it.

Paul Citarella
Founder, CEO/CTO at Jointli
jointli.com

Thanks Paul. I totally, completely and utterly agree!

I think there is huge scope for sharing all the big equipment types: DIY, gardening, photographic, sports etc. And again, I would love this to be driven by those at the wealthier end of spectrum. It's kind of scary considering how much room is taken up with all this equipment by wealthy households, and rarely most of it is used. If just two neighbours decided the pool their gardening stuff it would make a big difference.

The main difficulty getting there is that people have to find like-minded people in their area. If someone puts a boat share on yours2share in say Greece, then virtually anyone in Europe might be interested and there is high chance of finding people. If someone puts a lawnmower share on, they really have to find someone in their road. This is a much smaller group and a much lower chance of finding them on a website. My hope is that as creating private syndicates evolves, people start to talk to their neighbours about the possibilities.

Alongside this, I hope the peer-to-peer one-off rental model also grows rapidly as well. Maybe one model will work better than the other, maybe both will work alongside each other, I really don't mind, and in the end I just hope at least one of them takes off.

(BTW, I had real difficulty writing the section about "who owns what" with respect to horses. If it's 50/50, who gets the tail? If it's quarter shares, is that a leg each? It was difficult reining myself in.)

Helping people to share stuff
yours2share, WiRE Norwich and JellyNorfolk

I have tried to vent my frustration over maintaining my holiday house to my family before, but they have always ignored me. Now that I have stumbled upon this idea, I think that it is great and I will try to look for some friends who would be interested in sharing!

 Building Youth and Student Power for a New Economy

Recent comments